- 6 - In 1980 Vincent Farrell (Farrell) acquired a limited partnership interest in SAB Associates and in 1982 he acquired a limited partnership interest in SAB Resource Reclamation Associates (SAB Reclamation).3 SAB Reclamation purported to lease four Sentinel EPE recyclers in a series of transactions substantially identical to those in the Clearwater Group limited partnership (Clearwater), the partnership considered in Provizer v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1992-177. SAB Associates invested in plastics recycling partnerships like SAB Reclamation and Clearwater.4 On their 1981 and 1982 joint Federal income tax returns, petitioners claimed their pro rata share of SAB Associates' and SAB Reclamation's partnership losses and tax credits. In a notice of deficiency dated November 30, 1987, respondent determined deficiencies in petitioners' 1981 Federal income tax. Respondent disallowed petitioners' claimed losses and tax credits related to SAB Associates and determined additions to tax under section 6659 for valuation overstatement and under section 6653(a)(1) and (2) for negligence. Respondent also determined that interest on the deficiency accruing after 3 Petitioners own a 4.5-percent limited partnership interest in SAB Reclamation. The record does not disclose the amount of petitioners' percentage interest in SAB Associates. 4 SAB Associates was formed to engage in tax straddle investments. During 1981, it ceased engaging in tax straddle investments and changed its function to leasing Sentinel EPE recyclers.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011