Vincent and Clotilde Farrell, Jr. - Page 14

                                       - 14 -                                         
               Petitioners first argue that they are similarly situated to            
          Elliot Miller (Miller), the taxpayer in the Miller cases, and               
          that therefore they are entitled to the same settlement agreement           
          executed by respondent and Miller in those cases.                           
               Under the principle of "equality," the Commissioner has a              
          duty of consistency toward similarly situated taxpayers and                 
          cannot tax one and not tax another without some rational basis              
          for the difference.  United States v. Kaiser, 363 U.S. 299, 308             
          (1960) (concurring opinion); see Baker v. United States, 748 F.2d           
          1465 (11th Cir. 1984); Farmers' and Merchants' Bank v. United               
          States, 476 F.2d 406 (4th Cir. 1973).  Essentially, the principle           
          of equality precludes the Commissioner from making arbitrary                
          distinctions between like cases.  See Baker v. Commissioner, 787            
          F.2d 637, 643 (D.C. Cir. 1986), vacating 83 T.C. 822 (1984).                
               The different tax treatment accorded petitioners and Miller            
          was not arbitrary or irrational.  While petitioners and Miller              
          both invested in the Plastics Recycling project,9 their actions             
          with respect to such investments provide a rational basis for               
          treating them differently.  Miller foreclosed any potential                 
          liability for increased interest in his cases by making payments            
          prior to December 31, 1984; no interest accrued after that date.            


          9    The Millers were Schedule C owners of Sentinel EPE                     
          recyclers, while petitioners owned interests in limited                     
          partnerships that owned Sentinel EPE recyclers.  We consider this           
          difference to be negligible and of no consequence.  See Estate of           
          Satin v. Commissioner, supra; Fisher v. Commissioner, supra.                




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011