Stephen H. Glassley and Judith Glassley, et al. - Page 38

                                       - 38 -                                         
          plantation and sold jojoba seeds harvested from jojoba plants               
          growing there under the name Turtleback Jojoba Venture.                     
               For 1987, Turtleback Jojoba Venture reported a net farm loss           
          of $43,929 on Schedule F of its U.S. Partnership Return of                  
          Income, Form 1065.  For 1988, Turtleback Jojoba Venture reported            
          a net farm profit of $3,890 on Schedule F of its U.S. Partnership           
          Return of Income, Form 1065.12                                              
               At the same time that HJI exercised its option to enter into           
          Turtleback Jojoba Venture with JDP, HJI exercised an option to              
          convert the jojoba plantation purportedly allocated to JDP-II to            
          a commercial jojoba plantation and to enter into a joint venture            
          with JDP-II (Turtleback Jojoba Venture II).  Thereafter, HJI                
          treated Turtleback Jojoba Venture and Turtleback Jojoba Venture             
          II as one jojoba plantation (TJV).                                          
               During late 1987, Whittaker informed Berberich that the TJV            
          plantation was in good condition and had excellent prospects for            
          producing profitable yields of jojoba seeds, but that TJV was out           
          of funds.  She also indicated that harvesting efficiency was                
          unacceptably poor and that it would probably take several years             
          of continued development of machinery, equipment, and systems               
          before harvesting efficiency would be substantially improved.  In           


          12   In the Schedule F for 1988, Turtleback I Venture reported a            
          farm rent expenditure of only $3,500, rather than the minimum               
          $12,000 rental fee required under the farm lease.  Had Turtleback           
          I Venture reported the full $12,000 rental fee, the Schedule F              
          would have reflected a net farm loss of $4,610.                             




Page:  Previous  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011