Stephen H. Glassley and Judith Glassley, et al. - Page 69

                                       - 69 -                                         
          actions following the execution of the R & D Agreement with HJI             
          were ministerial at most and that HJI enjoyed complete discretion           
          and control over any research or experimentation as well as the             
          farming activities that were pursued after January 1, 1987.                 
               Respondent contends further that the second phase of JDP,              
          following the expiration of the R & D period, was highly                    
          speculative since it was conditioned on HJI's exercising an                 
          option to exploit the jojoba plantation that had been developed.            
          If HJI refused to exercise the option, however, JDP could only              
          realize profit from the arrangement by exercising its option to             
          lease the property from Whittaker Jojoba, in which JDP's general            
          partner held an interest.  Respondent argues that these highly              
          speculative and conditional arrangements could not rise to the              
          status of a business, realized or anticipated, on December 31,              
          1981, when the research and development fee was deducted.                   
          Respondent asserts that JDP was only a vehicle "for the injecting           
          of risk capital".  Green v. Commissioner, 83 T.C. 667, 687                  
          (1984); see also Levin v. Commissioner, 87 T.C. 698, 725 (1986),            
          affd. 832 F.2d 403 (7th Cir. 1987).                                         
               In Snow v. Commissioner, 416 U.S. 500 (1974), the Supreme              
          Court established that deductions under section 174 could be                
          claimed in connection with a trade or business even though the              
          taxpayer was not currently producing or selling any product.  In            
          following the Snow case, however, this Court has held that to be            
          entitled to a deduction the taxpayer must be engaged in a trade             




Page:  Previous  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011