Philippe and Nadine Grelsamer - Page 63

                                       - 63 -                                         
          this Court's earlier conclusion that the transaction lacked                 
          economic substance and was a sham.  Gilman v. Commissioner, supra           
          at 151.  In addition, the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit           
          agreed with this Court and with the Court of Appeals for the                
          Eighth Circuit that "'when an underpayment stems from disallowed            
          * * * investment credits due to lack of economic substance, the             
          deficiency is * * * subject to the penalty under section 6659.'"            
          Gilman v. Commissioner, supra at 151 (quoting Massengill v.                 
          Commissioner, 876 F.2d 616, 619-620 (8th Cir. 1989), affg. T.C.             
          Memo. 1988-427); see also Rybak v. Commissioner, 91 T.C. 524,               
          566-567 (1988); Zirker v. Commissioner, 87 T.C. 970, 978-979                
          (1986); Donahue v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1991-181, affd.                 
          without published opinion 959 F.2d 234 (6th Cir. 1992), affd. sub           
          nom. Pasternak v. Commissioner, 990 F.2d 893 (6th Cir. 1993).               
               Petitioners' reliance on Gainer v. Commissioner, 893 F.2d              
          225 (9th Cir. 1990), Todd v. Commissioner, 862 F.2d 540 (5th Cir.           
          1988), and McCrary v. Commissioner, 92 T.C. 827 (1989), is                  
          misplaced.  In those cases, in contrast to the consolidated cases           
          herein, it was found that a valuation overstatement did not                 
          contribute to an underpayment of taxes.  In the Todd and Gainer             
          cases, the underpayments were due exclusively to the fact that              
          the property in each case had not been placed in service.  In the           
          McCrary case, the underpayments were deemed to result from a                
          concession that the agreement at issue was a license and not a              






Page:  Previous  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011