- 72 -
C. Petitioners' Motions For Leave To File Motion for Decision
Ordering Relief From the Negligence Penalty and the Penalty Rate
of Interest and To File Supporting Memorandum of Law
Long after the trials of these cases, petitioners each filed
a Motion For Leave To File Motion for Decision Ordering Relief
From the Negligence Penalty and the Penalty Rate of Interest and
To File Supporting Memorandum of Law under Rule 50. Petitioners
also lodged with the Court motions for decision ordering relief
from the additions to tax for negligence and from the increased
rate of interest, with attachments, and memoranda in support of
such motions. Respondent filed objections, with attachments, and
memoranda in support thereof and petitioners thereafter filed
reply memoranda. Petitioners argue that they should be afforded
the same settlement that was reached between other taxpayers and
the IRS in Miller v. Commissioner docket Nos. 10382-86 and 10383-
86. See Farrell v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1996-295 (denying a
motion similar to petitioners' motions); see also Zenkel v.
Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1996-398.
Counsel for petitioners seek to raise a new issue long after
the trials in these cases. Resolution of such issue might well
require new trials. Such further trials "would be contrary to
the established policy of this Court to try all issues raised in
a case in one proceeding and to avoid piecemeal and protracted
litigation." Markwardt v. Commissioner, 64 T.C. 989, 998 (1975);
see also Robin Haft Trust v. Commissioner, 62 T.C. 145, 147
(1974). Consequently, under the circumstances here, at this late
Page: Previous 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 NextLast modified: May 25, 2011