Wilburn C. Hall, Jr. - Page 64

                                       - 64 -                                         
        he is entitled to Schedule C deductions for law practice office               
        expenses in the amounts of $27,000 for 1982, $8,000 for 1983,                 
        $5,000 for 1984, $3,000 for 1985, and $1,000 for 1986.                        
             Petitioner made $150 charitable contributions in 1982. He                
        deducted this amount on Schedule C. Petitioner has not shown that             
        this was an expense of his trade or business, and so his deduction            
        is allowable only as an itemized deduction on Schedule A, and not             
        on Schedule C. See Marquis v. Commissioner, 49 T.C. 695 (1968).               
             As to all of petitioner's other claimed Schedule C deductions            
        disallowed by respondent, petitioner has failed to carry his                  
        burden of proving his entitlement to deductions, whether on                   
        Schedule C, A, F, or E.                                                       
             We hold in part for respondent and in part for petitioner on             
        this issue.                                                                   
                                    IV. Section 1401                                  
             Section 1401 provides that a tax-shall be imposed on the                 
        self-employment income of every individual.                                   
             Respondent contends that to the extent petitioner has self-              
        employment income for 1983, 1985, and 1986, petitioner is liable              
        for the self-employment tax imposed by section 1401. Petitioner               
        disputes the imposition of all taxes determined by respondent in              
        the notice of deficiency.                                                     
             We agree with respondent.                                                
             Petitioner has the burden of proof on this matter. Rule                  
        142(a); Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. at 115. Petitioner has failed            




Page:  Previous  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011