Heritage Auto Center, Inc. - Page 17

                                        - 17 -                                        
          (1956).  Similarly, amounts paid by a buyer for a covenant not to           
          compete result in ordinary income to the covenantor, since they             
          represent a substitute for ordinary income and may be amortized             
          by the buyer over the covenant's useful life.  Throndson v.                 
          Commissioner, supra at 1024; Ullman v. Commissioner, 264 F.2d               
          305, 307 (2d Cir. 1959), affg. 29 T.C. 129 (1957); sec. 1.167(a)-           
          3, Income Tax Regs.                                                         
               The economic substance of a transaction, rather than the               
          form in which it is cast, is controlling for Federal income tax             
          purposes; thus, courts may pierce the form of a transaction and             
          tax the substance.  Griffiths v. Commissioner, 308 U.S. 355, 356-           
          357 (1939); Gregory v. Helvering, 293 U.S. 465, 469 (1935).  The            
          underlying philosophy of the "substance over form" doctrine is to           
          prevent taxpayers from attempting to subvert the taxing statutes            
          by relying upon mere legal formality.  Major v. Commissioner, 76            
          T.C. 239, 246 (1981).  This doctrine is applicable in cases such            
          as the one at bar, where the Commissioner is challenging an                 
          express contractual allocation.  See Schulz v. Commissioner, 294            
          F.2d 52, 56 (9th Cir. 1961), affg. 34 T.C. 235 (1960); O'Dell &             
          Co. v. Commissioner, 61 T.C. 461, 467 (1974).4  The burden of               


          4    This is not a case where the taxpayer is asserting that the substance of
          the agreement it entered is at variance with its form.  In such a case, courts
          have either required strong proof that the substance of the agreement was   
          different than its form, or they have limited the type of evidence that a   
          taxpayer may offer when attacking the contractual allocation.  E.g.,        
          Commissioner v. Danielson, 378 F.2d 771, 775 (3d Cir. 1967), vacating and   
          remanding 44 T.C. 549 (1965); Ullman v. Commissioner, 264 F.2d 305, 308 (2d 
          Cir. 1959), affg. 29 T.C. 129 (1957).                                       




Page:  Previous  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011