- 17 - ceipts of NDV for that day that he recorded in the gross receipts journal for 1987, was only $689.48. The difference between the respective grand totals for those two days (viz., $1,498.11) exceeded the total sales according to the Z reading on the cash register tape that Mr. Katerelos saved for January 4, 1987 (viz., $689.48) by $808.63. Such $808.63 excess was the total of the various amounts entered into the cash register for the 79 missing transactions between January 3, 1987, and January 4, 1987. Respondent's Audit During the summer of 1990, respondent's revenue agent, James Phielix (Mr. Phielix), conducted an audit of petitioners' returns for 1987, 1988, and 1989. Mr. Phielix' examination of their 1990 and 1991 returns did not commence until early 1993 because of an ongoing criminal tax investigation of Mr. Katerelos that ended when Mr. Katerelos was informed by correspondence dated December 15, 1992, that he was no longer the subject of such an investiga- tion. During the course of his examination of petitioners' returns for the years at issue, Mr. Phielix created a handwritten summary that showed for each day during the years at issue the following data or information displayed on the cash register tape that Mr. Katerelos saved for each day during those years: The date, the total sales according to the Z reading, the first and last transaction numbers, the number of missing transaction numbers between the first transaction number on the cash register forPage: Previous 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011