James H. Leste and Stacy Leste, et al. - Page 15

                                       - 15 -                                         
          contained both a consulting services component and a covenant not           
          to compete.  While the covenant not to compete did not have a               
          separately stated consideration, it did represent an additional             
          commitment on Silbernagel's part, supplemental to the consulting            
          commitment, and it was an added value for the consideration FAMC            
          was to pay Silbernagel monthly.  (Silbernagel had previously been           
          paid $8,000 per month for a covenant not to compete with WESAV for          
          a period of 18 months following WESAV's purchase of VALC's mobile           
          home mortgage servicing business.6)  We believe the $15,000 monthly         
          fee paid to Silbernagel constitutes reasonable compensation for             
          both the consulting services component and the covenant not to              
          compete in the agreement between Silbernagel  and  FAMC.7                   
          Consequently, we hold that: (1) FAMC is entitled to deduct all of           
          the payments made to Silbernagel pursuant to the consulting and             
          noncompetition agreement entered between those parties;8 (2) there          

               6    Although the agreement with WESAV also required                   
          Silbernagel to assist in effecting a smooth transfer of the                 
          business, we find that the payments under the agreement were                
          primarily designed to compensate him for his covenant not to                
          compete with WESAV for a period of 18 months following the sale.            
               7    In determining that the $15,000 monthly fee was                   
          reasonable, we recognize that there were subsequent reductions of           
          the monthly payment to $10,000 in February 1990, and to $5,000 in           
          May 1991.  Those reductions were the result of arm's-length                 
          negotiations precipitated by the decline in FAMC's loan servicing           
          business and the company's resulting financial difficulties.                
               8    Respondent suggests on brief that the payments under              
          the consulting and noncompetition agreement between Silbernagel             
          and FAMC were limited to the lesser of $300,000 per year or 25              
          percent of FAMC's after-tax profits, and therefore, FAMC's                  
          deduction should likewise be limited to this amount.  Moore                 
          testified at trial, however, that the monthly payments to                   
                                                             (continued...)           


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011