- 2 - adopts the Special Trial Judge's opinion, which is set forth below. OPINION OF THE SPECIAL TRIAL JUDGE PAJAK, Special Trial Judge: This case is before the Court on respondent's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution and respondent's Motion to Award Damages pursuant to section 6673. Respondent determined a deficiency in and additions to petitioners' Federal income tax, with increased interest, as follows: Increased Interest Additions to Tax under Sections under Section Year Deficiency 6653(a)(1) 6653(a)(2) 6661 6621(c) 1983 $25,256 $1,263 1 6,314 2 1 50 percent of the interest due on $25,256, which is the underpayment of tax due to negligence. 2 $16,800 of the deficiency is a substantial underpayment attributable to a tax motivated transaction for purposes of computing the interest payable with respect to such amount under section 6621(c). The Court must decide whether respondent's motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution should be granted and whether petitioners are liable for a penalty under section 6673. For clarity and convenience, the findings of fact and conclusions of law have been combined. Petitioners lived in Broken Arrow, Oklahoma, when their petition was filed. Petitioners filed their petition on October 19, 1987. They put the entire amount set forth in the notice of deficiency into controversy.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011