Gene E. & Marilyn Narramore - Page 9

                                                - 9 -                                                  
            proceeding is frivolous or groundless.  Based on the record, we                            
            conclude that such an award is appropriate in this case.                                   
                  Petitioners have pursued a frivolous and groundless position                         
            in this proceeding from the time that they submitted their Motion                          
            to Dismiss with the attached AAR on September 2, 1988, to their                            
            failure to appear at the Trial Session on October 4, 1994.                                 
            Petitioners' arguments are no more than stale tax protester                                
            contentions long dismissed summarily by this Court and all other                           
            courts which have heard such contentions.  See, e.g., Lonsdale v.                          
            United States, 919 F.2d 1440 (10th Cir. 1990) (this is the                                 
            circuit to which an appeal would lie in this case); Rowlee v.                              
            Commissioner, 80 T.C. 1111 (1983).                                                         
                  In sum, the conduct and the inaction described above support                         
            a finding that petitioners instituted and maintained this action                           
            primarily for delay.  We are convinced that petitioners knew                               
            their position to be groundless and frivolous, yet they persisted                          
            in maintaining this proceeding primarily to impede the proper                              
            workings of our judicial system and to delay the payment of their                          
            Federal income tax liabilities.  Accordingly, a penalty is                                 
            awarded to the United States under section 6673 in the amount of                           
            $7,500.                                                                                    
                  To reflect the foregoing,                                                            
                                                            An appropriate order and                   
                                                      decision will be entered.                        






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  

Last modified: May 25, 2011