Gene E. & Marilyn Narramore - Page 6

                                                - 6 -                                                  
                  Respondent received a July 4, 1994, letter from John B.                              
            Kotmair, Jr., of Save-A-Patriot Fellowship.  Mr. Kotmair and                               
            petitioners were advised by respondent that since Mr. Kotmair had                          
            not made an entry of appearance, respondent would continue to                              
            correspond directly with petitioners.  Thereafter, respondent                              
            received a letter dated August 5, 1994, from petitioner                                    
            describing a hearing disability and indicating that he would                               
            forward all correspondence to Mr. Kotmair.                                                 
                  An Order setting this case for trial at the Oklahoma Trial                           
            Session with a date certain of 10:00 a.m. Tuesday, October 4,                              
            1994, was served on petitioners on August 3, 1994.  Attached to                            
            the Order was a Standing Pre-Trial Order directing the parties to                          
            meet for purposes of settlement and/or preparation of a                                    
            stipulation, and warning that dismissal was possible if any                                
            unexcused failure to comply with the Order affected the timing or                          
            conduct of the trial.  Among other things, unless a basis of                               
            settlement had been reached, the parties were ordered to exchange                          
            Trial Memoranda.                                                                           
                  Respondent received a letter dated August 24, 1994, from                             
            petitioner in which petitioner stated that he was not subject to                           
            the jurisdiction of this Court as a result of the ARR previously                           
            sent to the Court.  In this letter, petitioner threatened a suit                           
            for damages against all individuals who did not honor the ARR.                             
                  Respondent, in a September 2, 1994, letter, again cautioned                          
            petitioners that the Court has authority to award a penalty of up                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011