Gene E. & Marilyn Narramore - Page 4

                                                - 4 -                                                  
            petitioners produce documents, and on August 25, 1988, also                                
            requested permission to enter petitioners' alleged mining claim                            
            for the purpose of inspecting it.  Petitioners failed to respond                           
            to these formal discovery requests.                                                        
                  On September 2, 1988, a letter from petitioners was filed by                         
            this Court as a Motion to Dismiss.  The motion, in part, asked                             
            that the petition be withdrawn due to an Affidavit of Revocation                           
            and Rescission (ARR), which was attached to the motion.  The ARR                           
            was replete with tax protester arguments.  In the ARR, Gene E.                             
            Narramore (petitioner) states that "I am not and never was a                               
            'taxpayer' as the term is defined in the Internal Revenue Code, a                          
            'person liable' for any Internal Revenue tax, or a 'person                                 
            subject to the provisions of that Code, and declare that I am,                             
            and have always been, a 'nontaxpayer.'"  The motion was denied on                          
            September 9, 1988.                                                                         
                  On November 7, 1988, this Court filed a November 2, 1988,                            
            two-page letter, from petitioner and treated it as a Motion to                             
            Vacate.  The letter again sought to withdraw the petition and                              
            again attached the AAR.  Petitioner's November 2, 1988, letter                             
            was also replete with familiar tax protester statements; i.e.,                             
            petitioner's "current 'non-taxpayer status'" and "fraud by the                             
            U.S. Government, the IRS, the various media and others."  It                               
            alluded to constitutional arguments that this Court and other                              
            Federal Courts have repeatedly held to be without merit.  E.g.                             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011