- 24 - Print 1985). The 11.5-month period of zero rent provided in the lease agreement fits squarely within the definition of a rent holiday in the committee report, and it is not necessary for the lease agreement to label it as such. Respondent also contends that the 11.5-month period of zero rent cannot qualify as a reasonable rent holiday described in section 467(b)(5)(C) because at the time Partnership and BCE entered into the lease agreement in June 1988 the inclusion of rent holidays in commercial leases was a reasonable and accept- able practice in the Denver office market only for commercial leases under which the lessees occupied the leased space, and the lease agreement was not such a lease. Rather, it was a master lease under which BCE, albeit the lessee, was not to occupy Republic Plaza except for a small amount of space; instead, BCE was to sublease space in that office building to other persons who were to occupy it. To counter respondent's arguments and to support its posi- tion that the 11.5-month period of zero rent qualifies as a reasonable rent holiday described in section 467(b)(5)(C), petitioner relies, inter alia, on the opinions of two expert witnesses, Mr. Atkins and Mr. Whitcomb, who are qualified as experts in real estate appraisal and who prepared the Marshall and Stevens appraisal report. We evaluate the opinions of experts in light of the quali-Page: Previous 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011