Republic Plaza Properties Partnership, PFI Republic Limited, Inc., Tax Matters Partner - Page 26

                                       - 26 -                                         

          Parker v. Commissioner, supra at 562.  Furthermore, we may reject           
          the opinion of an expert witness in its entirety.  See Palmer v.            
          Commissioner, 523 F.2d 1308, 1310 (8th Cir. 1975), affg. 62 T.C.            
          684 (1974); Parker v. Commissioner, supra at 562-565.                       
               We have evaluated the Marshall and Stevens appraisal report            
          and the letters, opinions, and analyses of Mr. Atkins and Mr.               
          Whitcomb, both of whom we found credible.  We found that report             
          and those letters, opinions, and analyses to be cogent and                  
          persuasive, and we have relied on them in making our findings               
          herein.                                                                     
               According to Mr. Atkins, at the time the lease agreement was           
          signed in June 1988, lessors in the Denver office market were               
          typically offering 6 months of free rent on 5-year leases and 12            
          months of free rent on 10-year leases.  In the opinion of Mr.               
          Atkins, the 11.5-month period of zero rent provided in the lease            
          agreement was consistent with reasonable and acceptable practice            
          in the Denver office market at the time that lease agreement was            
          executed.16  According to Mr. Atkins, it was a reasonable and               

          16  Although Mr. Atkins did not identify a situation in the                 
          Denver office market of a rent holiday being offered in a lease             
          under which the lessee did not occupy the leased space, he did              
          identify two situations in localities outside that market in                
          which lessees who did not occupy the leased spaced received rent            
          holidays and discussed, but did not identify because of con-                
          straints imposed on him regarding their confidentiality, certain            
          other situations of which he was aware in which lessees received            
          rent holidays and did not occupy the leased space.  According to            
          Mr. Atkins, those situations about which he testified were                  
                                                             (continued...)           




Page:  Previous  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011