- 4 -
(d) Plaintiff was unfavorably evaluated by
her supervisors and unfavorable evaluations were
maintained in her personnel files.
(e) Plaintiff was issued discriminatory
directives by her supervisors including letters of
deficiency, warning, instruction and concern.
3.8 Plaintiff was coerced into withdrawing a
complaint of sex discrimination filed in 1979 by
statements from the Director of Employee and Labor
Relations that her complaint would harm her career
opportunities.
* * * * * * *
3.11 Defendants' discriminating letters and
evaluations in 1981 created a chilling effect of such
proportion that it was fruitless to apply for
promotions for which she was qualified.
3.12 Defendants treated plaintiff differently
from similarly situated employees by failing to
accommodate plaintiff's handicapping conditions of
heart disease and stress induced illness from November
1983 to the present * * *.
3.13 As a result of filing complaints of
violations of her equal employment opportunity,
plaintiff was denied training details and assignments,
denied promotions, given unfavorable evaluations,
discouraged from applying for promotions and coerced
into withdrawing a complaint alleging sex
discrimination.
Petitioner based her discrimination allegations on the following:
1.1 [Title VII of] The Civil Rights Act of 1964
as amended, 42 USC Sec. 2000 e-16(c);
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act, as
amended, 29 USC Sec. 621, et seq.;
The Civil Rights Attorneys Fee Act of 1976,
as amended, 42 USC Sec. 1988;
39 USC Sec. 409, and application thereof by
the courts, permitting judicial review of final
decisions of the U.S. Postal Service;
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011