- 4 - (d) Plaintiff was unfavorably evaluated by her supervisors and unfavorable evaluations were maintained in her personnel files. (e) Plaintiff was issued discriminatory directives by her supervisors including letters of deficiency, warning, instruction and concern. 3.8 Plaintiff was coerced into withdrawing a complaint of sex discrimination filed in 1979 by statements from the Director of Employee and Labor Relations that her complaint would harm her career opportunities. * * * * * * * 3.11 Defendants' discriminating letters and evaluations in 1981 created a chilling effect of such proportion that it was fruitless to apply for promotions for which she was qualified. 3.12 Defendants treated plaintiff differently from similarly situated employees by failing to accommodate plaintiff's handicapping conditions of heart disease and stress induced illness from November 1983 to the present * * *. 3.13 As a result of filing complaints of violations of her equal employment opportunity, plaintiff was denied training details and assignments, denied promotions, given unfavorable evaluations, discouraged from applying for promotions and coerced into withdrawing a complaint alleging sex discrimination. Petitioner based her discrimination allegations on the following: 1.1 [Title VII of] The Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended, 42 USC Sec. 2000 e-16(c); The Age Discrimination in Employment Act, as amended, 29 USC Sec. 621, et seq.; The Civil Rights Attorneys Fee Act of 1976, as amended, 42 USC Sec. 1988; 39 USC Sec. 409, and application thereof by the courts, permitting judicial review of final decisions of the U.S. Postal Service;Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011