Beverly T. Rutt-Hahn - Page 11

                                       - 11 -                                         
               Monetary remedies under the ADEA are limited to back                   
               wages, which are clearly of an "economic character,"                   
               and liquidated damages, which we have already noted                    
               serve no compensatory function.  Thus, though this is a                
               closer case than Burke, we conclude that a recovery                    
               under the ADEA is not one that is "based upon tort or                  
               tort type rights."                                                     
          Commissioner v. Schleier, 515 U.S. at ___, 115 S. Ct. at 2167.              
          Consequently, petitioner is not entitled to exclude from income             
          the $75,000 she received from the Postal Service.                           
               Petitioner also received $23,106.64 from the Office of                 
          Personnel Management reflecting changes to her disability                   
          retirement benefits.  Petitioner appears to make two basic                  
          arguments for exclusion of the disability retirement benefits.              
          First, she considers it to be part of the total settlement she              
          received from the Postal Service, and therefore excludable under            
          section 104(a)(2).  For the reasons stated above, the increased             
          retirement benefits are not damages received on account of                  
          personal injuries or sickness within the meaning of section                 
          104(a)(2).                                                                  
               Petitioner also cites section 104(a)(4) and argues that                
          gross income does not include a "disability annuity", and                   
          therefore the payment in question is not income.                            
               In the settlement agreement, the Postal Service agreed to              
          adjust petitioner's records to reflect a promotion, and then                
          transmit the information to the Office of Personnel Management,             
          which would then recalculate and pay to petitioner any additional           
          retirement benefits due based on her retroactive promotion.  As             




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011