Summit Sheet Metal Co. - Page 24

                                       - 24 -                                         

               This factor tends to show that the compensation at issue was           
          reasonable.                                                                 
                    h.   Prevailing Rates of Compensation for Comparable              
                         Positions in Comparable Companies                            
               In deciding whether compensation is reasonable, we compare             
          it to compensation paid for comparable positions in comparable              
          companies.  Elliotts, Inc. v. Commissioner, 716 F.2d 1241 (9th              
          Cir. 1983); Mayson Manufacturing Co. v. Commissioner, 178 F.2d              
          115 (6th Cir. 1949).  Scott points out that petitioner's officers           
          were paid more than the average paid to officers of companies               
          that responded to the SMACNA and Contractor magazine surveys.               
          While both surveys have flaws for our purposes, respondent                  
          offered no evidence on salary comparability.  We conclude that              
          this factor tends to show that the compensation was unreasonable.           
                    i.   Compensation Paid in Prior Years                             
               An employer may deduct compensation paid in a year even                
          though the employee performed the services in a prior year.                 
          Lucas v. Ox Fibre Brush Co., 281 U.S. 115, 119 (1930); R.J.                 
          Nicoll Co. v. Commissioner, 59 T.C. at 50-51.                               
               Petitioner's officers testified that petitioner may have               
          underpaid them in the early years, but that petitioner caught up            
          at least 10 years before the years in issue.  Respondent points             
          out that petitioner offered no documentary evidence on this                 
          factor; however, respondent offered no evidence that contradicts            






Page:  Previous  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011