Summit Sheet Metal Co. - Page 30

                                       - 30 -                                         

          Petitioner relies on Douthit v. United States, 299 F. Supp. 397             
          (W.D. Tenn. 1969), revd. on other grounds 432 F.2d 83 (6th Cir.             
          1970).  On May 13, 1960, Congress enacted the Dealer Reserve                
          Adjustment Act of 1960, Pub. L. 86-459, 74 Stat. 124.  That act             
          required the taxpayers in Douthit to change their method of                 
          accounting.  The taxpayers in Douthit sought to comply with the             
          new law on their tax return for 1961.                                       
               The court in Douthit said:  "Section 446(e) requiring                  
          consent of the Commissioner is not applicable to a change in                
          accounting required by law."  Douthit v. United States, supra at            
          403.  In Douthit, the taxpayers changed their treatment of an               
          item in the tax return they filed for the first year in which the           
          law was effective.  Id. at 400.  In the instant case, the change            
          in law on which petitioner relies occurred in 1984 and was                  
          effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 1983.              
          Deficit Reduction Act of 1984, Pub. L. 98-369, sec. 174(a)(1) and           
          (b)(2)(A), 98 Stat. 494, 704, 708.  Petitioner first cited                  
          section 267(a) in this case in 1994 after the audit of its 1987             
          return and while this case was pending.  Petitioner does not                
          contend that it raised this issue with respondent before that               
          time.  The rationale for allowing a taxpayer to change an                   
          accounting method immediately after the law is changed, e.g., to            
          simplify prompt compliance by a large number of taxpayers, is               







Page:  Previous  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011