Summit Sheet Metal Co. - Page 27

                                       - 27 -                                         

               Petitioner contends that changing the year it deducts its              
          officers' bonuses is not a change of accounting method, and that            
          it is a correction required to comply with section 267(a).                  
          Section 267(a)(2), which was enacted in 1984, bars a taxpayer               
          from deducting a payment to a related taxpayer before the related           
          taxpayer includes the payment in income.  Petitioner contends               
          that its accrual of a deduction for the bonuses in the year they            
          are awarded (before they are paid) violates section 267(a)(2)               
          because petitioner's officers included the bonuses in income in a           
          later year.  Petitioner contends that it does not need                      
          respondent's consent to change to comply with section 267(a)(2).            

               4(...continued)                                                        
          petitioner must have consent under sec. 446(e) is new matter on             
          which respondent bears the burden of proof.  We agree.                      
          Respondent first raised this issue in the amended answer.  A new            
          theory that is presented to sustain a deficiency is treated as a            
          new matter when it either increases the original deficiency or              
          requires the taxpayer to present different evidence.  Wayne Bolt            
          & Nut Co. v. Commissioner, 93 T.C. 500, 507 (1989); Achiro v.               
          Commissioner, 77 T.C. 881, 890-891 (1981).  This issue is a new             
          matter because the evidence relevant to it differs from that                
          relevant to the original determination.  Respondent bears the               
          burden of proof for any new matter.  Rule 142(a).                           
               Petitioner contends that respondent failed to carry the                
          burden of proof.  We disagree.  The parties do not dispute that             
          petitioner had a longstanding practice of deducting the bonuses             
          in the year it authorized them and paying them in the following             
          year, that petitioner seeks to change the year it deducts the               
          bonuses for its officers from the year in issue to the next                 
          taxable year to comply with sec. 267(a) several years after the             
          law changed, and that petitioner does not have respondent's                 
          consent to do so.  We decide this issue based on those facts.               
          Thus, the burden of proof does not affect our decision on this              
          issue.                                                                      





Page:  Previous  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011