- 21 - 4975(c)(1)(E) further defines a prohibited transaction as including any "act by a disqualified person who is a fiduciary[13] whereby he deals with the income or assets of a plan in his own interest or for his own account". We find that it was unreasonable for respondent to maintain that a prohibited transaction occurred when Worldwide's stock was acquired by IRA #1. The stock acquired in that transaction was newly issued--prior to that point in time, Worldwide had no shares or shareholders. A corporation without shares or 12(...continued) powers or responsibilities similar to those of officers or directors), a 10 percent or more shareholder, or a highly compensated employee (earning 10 percent or more of the yearly wages of an employer) of a person described in subparagraph (C), (D), (E), or (G) * * * [Emphasis added.] 13 In pertinent part, a "fiduciary" is defined by sec. 4975(e)(3) as any person who: (A) exercises any discretionary authority or discretionary control respecting management of such plan or exercises any authority or control respecting management or disposition of its assets, [or] * * * * * * * (C) has any discretionary authority or discretionary responsibility in the administration of such plan. At all relevant times, petitioner maintained and exercised the right to direct IRA #1's investments. Petitioner, therefore, was clearly a "fiduciary" with respect to IRA #1 and thereby a "disqualified person" as defined under sec. 4975(e)(2)(A). Furthermore, as petitioner was the sole individual for whose benefit IRA #1 was established, IRA #1 itself was a disqualified person pursuant to sec. 4975(e)(2)(G)(iii).Page: Previous 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011