James H. Swanson and Josephine A. Swanson - Page 24

                                       - 24 -                                         
          the assets of IRA #1 in his own interest.  Section 4975(c)(1)(E)            
          addresses itself only to acts of disqualified persons who, as               
          fiduciaries, deal directly or indirectly with the income or                 
          assets of a plan for their own benefit or account.  Here, there             
          was no such direct or indirect dealing with the income or assets            
          of a plan, as the dividends paid by Worldwide did not become                
          income of IRA #1 until unqualifiedly made subject to the demand             
          of IRA #1.  Sec. 1.301-1(b), Income Tax Regs.  Furthermore,                 
          respondent has never suggested that petitioner, acting as a                 
          "fiduciary" or otherwise, ever dealt with the corpus of IRA #1              
          for his own benefit.                                                        
               Based on the record, the only direct or indirect benefit               
          that petitioner realized from the payments of dividends by                  
          Worldwide related solely to his status as a participant of IRA              
          #1.  In this regard, petitioner benefited only insofar as IRA #1            
          accumulated assets for future distribution.  Section 4975(d)(9)             
          states that section 4975(c) shall not apply to:                             
               receipt by a disqualified person of any benefit to                     
               which he may be entitled as a participant or                           
               beneficiary in the plan, so long as the benefit is                     
               computed and paid on a basis which is consistent with                  
               the terms of the plan as applied to all other                          
               participants and beneficiaries.                                        
          Thus, we find that under the plain meaning17 of section                     
          4975(c)(1)(E), respondent was not substantially justified in                


          17                                                                          
               See the discussion supra note 16 regarding application of a            
          statute's plain meaning.                                                    




Page:  Previous  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011