James H. Swanson and Josephine A. Swanson - Page 22

                                       - 22 -                                         
          shareholders does not fit within the definition of a disqualified           
          person under section 4975(e)(2)(G).14  It was only after                    
          Worldwide issued its stock to IRA #1 that petitioner held a                 
          beneficial interest in Worldwide's stock, thereby causing                   
          Worldwide to become a disqualified person under section                     
          4975(e)(2)(G).15  Accordingly, the issuance of stock to IRA #1              

          14                                                                          
               Furthermore, we find that at the time of the stock issuance,           
          Worldwide was not, within the meaning of sec. 4975(e)(2)(C), an             
          "employer", any of whose employees were beneficiaries of IRA #1.            
          Although sec. 4975 does not define the term "employer", we find             
          guidance in sec. 3(5) of the Employee Retirement Income Security            
          Act of 1974 (ERISA), Pub. L. 93-406, 88 Stat. 829, 834.  In                 
          pertinent part, ERISA sec. 3(5) provides that, for plans such as            
          an IRA, an "'employer' means any person acting directly as an               
          employer, or indirectly in the interest of an employer, in                  
          relation to an employee benefit plan * * *."  Because Worldwide             
          did not maintain, sponsor, or directly contribute to IRA #1, we             
          find that Worldwide was not acting as an "employer" in relation             
          to an employee plan, and was not, therefore, a disqualified                 
          person under sec. 4975(e)(2)(C).  As there is no evidence that              
          Worldwide was an "employee organization", any of whose members              
          were participants in IRA #1, we also find that Worldwide was not            
          a disqualified person under sec. 4975(e)(2)(D).                             
          15                                                                          
               Sec. 4975(e)(4) incorporates the constructive ownership rule           
          of sec. 267(c)(1), which states that:                                       
               Stock owned, directly or indirectly, by or for a                       
               corporation, partnership, estate, or trust shall be                    
               considered as being owned proportionately by or for its                
               shareholders, partners, or beneficiaries * * *                         
          Petitioner, as the sole individual for whose benefit IRA #1                 
          was established, was therefore beneficial owner of all the                  
          outstanding shares of Worldwide after they were issued.  Because            
          petitioner, as the sole beneficial shareholder of Worldwide, was            
          also a "fiduciary" with respect to IRA #1, Worldwide thus met the           
          definition of a disqualified person under sec. 4975(e)(2)(G).               
               Contrary to respondent's representations, petitioner was not           
          a "disqualified person" as president and director of Worldwide              
          until after the stock was issued to IRA #1.  Sec. 4975(e)(2)(H).            
          Furthermore, petitioner was not a disqualified person under sec.            
                                                             (continued...)           



Page:  Previous  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011