J.J. Zand - Page 18

                                        - 107 -                                       

               As of March 1979, prior to the time the original 1979 return           
          was filed, Special Agent Bennett had begun a criminal                       
          investigation regarding petitioner's tax returns.                           
               On petitioner's 1979 joint Federal income tax return, as               
          originally filed, petitioner included in income $1,617,761 which            
          he had received, had in his possession, and for which he claimed            
          ownership.  Petitioner filed an amended joint return for 1979,              
          claiming that his 1979 income should be reduced by $348,350.                
          Petitioner states that this amount is attributable to a lawsuit             
          involving the 1977 sale of his Diesel Power stock.  The record              
          contains no explanation as to how the $348,350 claimed reduction            
          was calculated.                                                             
               On the joint 1981 tax return petitioner claimed that the               
          calculated tax due of $315,928 should be reduced to $0.                     
          Petitioner states that he is entitled to deduct $735,000                    
          previously included in income under a claim of right because that           
          amount had been repaid.  The only evidence offered in support of            
          the $735,000 calculation was Exhibit 556-UJ.  That exhibit was              
          admitted by the Court for the limited purpose of establishing               
          that litigation had occurred.                                               
               The 1977 sale of Diesel Power stock was a separate tax event           
          from the 1979 claim of right over commission income held by                 
          petitioner.  Therefore, he is not entitled to reduce reported               
          1979 income by the $348,350 unexplained claim.                              





Page:  Previous  97  98  99  100  101  102  103  104  105  106  107  108  109  110  111  112  113  114  115  116  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011