- 262 - petitioner's accountant, Mr. Dutton, recognized in a memorandum to the file in September 1977 that the advances by McCabe and petitioner were contributions to capital and that further contributions would be needed. All of the objective indications are that the advances by petitioner and McCabe were made under terms and conditions that a commercial lender would not grant, were subordinated to such commercial debt, and were in exact ratio to stockholdings. We think such advances are properly characterized as contributions to capital and not debt. When petitioner fleetingly received the title to the properties before signing them over to Kenyon College, he did not include the properties in his income as a dividend or otherwise treat his receipt of the properties as an occasion for recognizing gain. Therefore, he had no basis in such properties. Having a zero basis in the realty, petitioner would have had at least $657,000 of short-term gain if the realty had been sold. Thus, his $657,000 contribution is reduced to zero. Accordingly, we conclude that the charitable contribution limitations of section 170(e)(1) apply to reduce petitioner's allowable charitable deduction to Kenyon College to zero. VIII. Issue 12--Losses From Trusts, Partnerships, Subchapter S Corporation, and Farming Operations For the years 1979 and 1980 petitioner claimed losses on his tax returns attributable to the Bowling Green partnership ofPage: Previous 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011