- 258 - demolish the building at the time it is purchased. The record shows that petitioner had no such intention. An intent formed after the acquisition does not suffice. Panhandle State Bank v. Commissioner, 39 T.C. 813, 816 (1963). The second reason is that the house was not demolished, but was removed to a park and apparently is still being used. Respondent also contends that petitioner, having claimed the book value ($38,662.62) of the house on his return, did not establish its fair market value when he donated it to the city. We disagree. We have found in these circumstances that the house had a fair market value of $27,333.41, which represents the cost allocated by petitioner to the house for depreciation purposes in 1975. We regard this amount as being equivalent to its fair market value. Consequently, we hold that petitioner is entitled to a charitable contribution deduction of $40,333.41 ($27,333.41 plus $13,000) in 1976. C. Deduction for Charitable Contribution to Kenyon College On the 1979 income tax return petitioner claimed a charitable contribution deduction of $657,000 that pertained to real estate given by him to Kenyon College in honor of his friend Bill McCabe, who was dying of cancer. The claimed deduction was reduced to zero by respondent in the notice of deficiency on the ground that petitioner realized ordinary income from the transaction.Page: Previous 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011