J.J. Zand - Page 184

                                        - 258 -                                       

          demolish the building at the time it is purchased.  The record              
          shows that petitioner had no such intention.  An intent formed              
          after the acquisition does not suffice.  Panhandle State Bank v.            
          Commissioner, 39 T.C. 813, 816 (1963).  The second reason is that           
          the house was not demolished, but was removed to a park and                 
          apparently is still being used.                                             
               Respondent also contends that petitioner, having claimed the           
          book value ($38,662.62) of the house on his return, did not                 
          establish its fair market value when he donated it to the city.             
          We disagree.  We have found in these circumstances that the house           
          had a fair market value of $27,333.41, which represents the cost            
          allocated by petitioner to the house for depreciation purposes in           
          1975.  We regard this amount as being equivalent to its fair                
          market value.  Consequently, we hold that petitioner is entitled            
          to a charitable contribution deduction of $40,333.41 ($27,333.41            
          plus $13,000) in 1976.                                                      
               C.  Deduction for Charitable Contribution to Kenyon College            
               On the 1979 income tax return petitioner claimed a                     
          charitable contribution deduction of $657,000 that pertained to             
          real estate given by him to Kenyon College in honor of his friend           
          Bill McCabe, who was dying of cancer.  The claimed deduction was            
          reduced to zero by respondent in the notice of deficiency on the            
          ground that petitioner realized ordinary income from the                    
          transaction.                                                                





Page:  Previous  248  249  250  251  252  253  254  255  256  257  258  259  260  261  262  263  264  265  266  267  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011