- 73 -
fact that the records here plainly show that the overvaluation of
the recyclers was the underlying reason for disallowance of the
claimed tax benefits, we conclude that the deficiencies were
attributable to overvaluation of the Sentinel EPE recyclers.
3. Section 6659(e)
Petitioners argue that respondent erroneously failed to
waive the section 6659 additions to tax. Section 6659(e)
authorizes respondent to waive all or part of the addition to tax
for valuation overstatements if taxpayers establish that there
was a reasonable basis for the adjusted bases or valuations
claimed on the returns and that such claims were made in good
faith. Respondent's refusal to waive a section 6659 addition to
tax is reviewable by this Court for abuse of discretion. Krause
v. Commissioner, 99 T.C. at 179. Abuse of discretion has been
found in situations where respondent's refusal to exercise her
discretion is arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable. See
Mailman v. Commissioner, 91 T.C. 1079 (1988); Estate of Gardner
v. Commissioner, 82 T.C. 989 (1984); Haught v. Commissioner, T.C.
Memo. 1993-58. We note initially that petitioners did not
request respondent to waive the section 6659 additions to tax
until many months after the trials of the these cases. We are
reluctant to find that respondent abused her discretion in cases
in which she was not timely requested to exercise it and where
Page: Previous 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 NextLast modified: May 25, 2011