American Stores Company and Subsidiaries - Page 40

                                       - 40 -                                         
               Despite the existence of these taxpayer-friendly rulings,              
          courts imposed a stricter standard for the accrual of vacation              
          pay liabilities in instances where earned vacation pay                      
          entitlements were forfeitable due to post-yearend contingencies.            
          E.g., E.H. Sheldon & Co. v. Commissioner, 19 T.C. 481 (1952),               
          affd. in part and revd. in part 214 F.2d 655 (6th Cir. 1954);               
          Tennessee Consol. Coal Co. v. Commissioner, 15 T.C. 424 (1950).             
               In light of these decisions, the IRS issued Rev. Rul. 54-              
          608, 1954-2 C.B. 8, which revoked I.T. 3956 and modified G.C.M.             
          25261, 1947-2 C.B. 44.  The ruling stated that employers must               
          "clearly establish" the fact of liability to individual employees           
          by the end of a tax year to accrue vacation pay in that year.               
          Rev. Rul. 54-608, 1954-2 C.B. at 9-10.  Consequently, if an                 
          employee had to remain employed beyond the end of the year and              
          until the scheduled vacation period in order to fix the                     
          employer's liability, respondent did not consider the liability             
          to be accruable.                                                            
               To prevent hardship to taxpayers who had relied on I.T.                
          3956, Congress continually delayed the effective date of Rev.               
          Rul. 54-608 while it studied the vacation pay issue.  See Denver            
          & Rio Grande W. R.R. v. Commissioner, 38 T.C. 557, 575-576 nn.8,            
          9 (1962).  Congress subsequently enacted section 463 in direct              
          response to the strict accrual doctrine set forth in the ruling.            








Page:  Previous  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011