- 10 - claimed a deduction of only $74,350 with respect to the Cloudia. The record does not explain the nature of the additional amount disallowed by respondent, viz $413, and petitioner has raised no issue regarding this additional amount. The dispute between the parties over the deduction of petitioner's alleged losses incurred in connection with the Cloudia turns on whether the losses were incurred in an activity not entered into for profit. Section 183(a) provides: (a) General Rule.--In the case of an activity engaged in by an individual or an S corporation, if such activity is not engaged in for profit, no deduction attributable to such activity shall be allowed under this chapter except as provided in this section. For this purpose, section 183(c) defines the phrase "activity not engaged in for profit" to mean "any activity other than one with respect to which deductions are allow- able for the taxable year under section 162 or under paragraph (1) or (2) of section 212." If we find on the basis of all of the facts and circumstances of the case that petitioner's activity with respect to the Cloudia was "not engaged in for profit" within the meaning of section 183(c), then no deductions with respect to thatPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011