Frank R. Courbois - Page 14

                                                - 14 -                                                   

                generally, on all of the facts and circumstances of the                                  
                record, and specifically, on the factors set forth in                                    
                section 1.183-2(b), Income Tax Regs.                                                     
                      Petitioner acknowledged during his testimony that he                               
                was not businesslike in his approach to the activity.  See                               
                sec. 1.183-2(b)(1), Income Tax Regs.  He did not maintain                                
                receipts of his cash expenditures.  He did not establish                                 
                a bank account for the activity.  He did not maintain any                                
                books and records for the activity.  He did not advertise                                
                the availability of the vessel.                                                          
                      We are skeptical about petitioner's testimony con-                                 
                cerning his alleged intent for acquiring and holding the                                 
                Cloudia.  We find it difficult to believe that petitioner,                               
                an attorney, would pay $110,000 for a sailboat without                                   
                first determining whether it was seaworthy and whether                                   
                it could be used for its intended purpose.  We note that                                 
                petitioner made passing reference during his testimony                                   
                to an "initial survey" of the vessel, but he failed to                                   
                introduce any such survey into evidence.                                                 
                      We are also skeptical about petitioner’s assertion                                 
                that he held Cloudia for appreciation in value.  See sec.                                
                1.183-2(b)(4), Income Tax Regs.  Petitioner testified that                               
                as of the time of trial he could sell the Cloudia for                                    
                "somewhere" between $125,000 and $150,000.  However, as                                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011