Dorchester Industries Incorporated, et al. - Page 15

                                       - 15 -                                         
               binding settlement agreement, the actual merits of the                 
               settled controversy are without consequence.  This                     
               Court has declined to set aside a settlement duly                      
               executed by the parties and filed with the Court in the                
               absence of fraud or mutual mistake.  Stamm Intl. Corp.                 
               v. Commissioner, 90 T.C. 315 (1988); Spector v.                        
               Commissioner, 42 T.C. 110 (1964).  However, a court                    
               will not force a settlement on parties where no                        
               settlement was intended.  Autera v. Robinson, 419 F.2d                 
               1197 (D.C. Cir. 1969).                                                 
                    A settlement is a contract and, consequently,                     
               general principles of contract law determine whether a                 
               settlement has been reached.  Robbins Tire & Rubber Co.                
               v. Commissioner, 52 T.C. 420, 435-436, supplemented by                 
               53 T.C. 275 (1969).  A prerequisite to the formation of                
               a contract is an objective manifestation of mutual                     
               assent to its essential terms.  Heil v. Commissioner,                  
               T.C. Memo. 1994-417; 17A Am. Jur. 2d, Contracts, secs.                 
               27 and 28 (1991); 1 Williston on Contracts, sec. 3:5                   
               (4th ed. 1990).  Mutual assent generally requires an                   
               offer and an acceptance. 17A Am. Jur. 2d, Contracts,                   
               sec. 41 (1991).  "An offer is the manifestation of                     
               willingness to enter into a bargain, so made as to                     
               justify another person in understanding that his assent                
               to that bargain is invited and will conclude it."                      
               1 Restatement, Contracts 2d, sec. 24 (1981).                           
                    In a tax case, it "is not necessary that the                      
               parties execute a closing agreement under section 7121                 
               in order to settle a case pending before this Court,                   
               but, rather, a settlement agreement may be reached                     
               through offer and acceptance made by letter, or even in                
               the absence of a writing."  Lamborn v. Commissioner,                   
               T.C. Memo. 1994-515.  Settlement offers made and                       
               accepted by letters are enforced as binding agreements.                
               Haiduk v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1990-506; see also                  
               Himmelwright v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1988-114.                     
          Manko v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1995-10.                                  
               B.  Authority                                                          
               If a settlement agreement was reached here, it was not                 
          reached by Frank Wheaton negotiating directly on his own behalf             
          and on behalf of Dorchester.  Respondent was represented by                 





Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011