- 3 -
FINDINGS OF FACT3
Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.
Petitioner resided in The Plains, Virginia, at the time the
petition was filed.
During all relevant periods, petitioner, who holds a bache-
lor's degree in philosophy, a master's degree in clinical psy-
chology, and a Ph.D. degree in psychology, practiced as a psy-
chologist and his income from that practice provided his support.
Throughout the years at issue, petitioner devoted an average of
58 hours a week to his psychology practice.
From the late 1970's through sometime in 1987, petitioner
served as a director of several mental health clinics that are
part of the Prince George’s County, Maryland, health system.
From sometime in 1987 through 1989, petitioner practiced as a
psychologist at the Saint Luke Institute, a private psychiatric
hospital in Suitland, Maryland. From 1988 through 1994, peti-
tioner provided psychological testing and counseling services
under the name Psychological Testing Services. From 1989 through
1994, petitioner provided psychological services at the New Life
3 At the conclusion of the trial herein, the Court ordered the
parties to file simultaneous opening and answering briefs. Both
of petitioner's briefs failed to comply with Rule 151(e)(3). For
example, petitioner's opening brief did not contain proposed
findings of fact as required by that Rule. However, his answer-
ing brief contained what amounted to proposed findings of fact to
which respondent did not have the opportunity to object. Conse-
quently, we did not use the proposed findings of fact contained
in petitioner's answering brief as an aid in finding the facts in
this case.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011