Michael Ferguson and Valene Ferguson - Page 14

                                       - 14 -                                         
          other grounds 523 F.2d 1308 (8th Cir. 1975), petitioners assert             
          that the Charities were not legally obligated, nor could they be            
          compelled, to tender their AHC stock in accordance with the                 
          tender offer, and, therefore, the proceeds received by the                  
          Charities in exchange for AHC stock that was voluntarily tendered           
          cannot be attributed to petitioners.  Second, relying primarily             
          on Hudspeth v. United States, 471 F.2d 275 (8th Cir. 1972), and             
          Estate of Applestein v. Commissioner, 80 T.C. 331 (1983),                   
          petitioners assert that the date on which the right to the tender           
          offer proceeds matured was October 12, 1988, when the board of              
          directors of DC Acquisition adopted a resolution stating the                
          terms of the merger, and that the gifts occurred prior to that              
          date.  Petitioners argue, alternatively, that the earliest date             
          on which the right to the tender offer proceeds matured was                 
          September 12, 1988, when DC Acquisition formally announced that             
          it had accepted all of the tendered or guaranteed shares of AHC             
          stock, and that the gifts occurred prior to that date.                      
               Respondent, relying primarily on our decisions in Estate of            
          Applestein and Peterson Trust v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1986-             
          267, affd. without published opinion 822 F.2d 1093 (8th Cir.                
          1987), contends that the July 28, 1988, merger agreement (the               
          merger agreement) coupled with the August 3, 1988, tender offer             
          at a price of $22.50 a share (the tender offer) was, in reality             
          and substance, the functional equivalent to a shareholder vote              






Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011