Robert Hunter Gridley and Barbara A. Gridley, et al. - Page 7

                                        - 7 -                                         

                         (a)  Respondent concedes that the                            
               petitioner(s) are not liable for additions to tax under                
               I.R.C. � 6653(a) or � 6653(a)(1) or � 6653(a)(2) for                   
               any year prior to the taxable year 1982.                               
                    The parties agree to this stipulation of                          
               settlement.                                                            
          On September 21, 1987, the Fleers executed a piggyback agreement            
          identical to the 1986 piggyback agreement and filed the same with           
          the Court in docket No. 13477-87.                                           
          Test Case History                                                           
               On December 11, 1991, following a trial on the merits of the           
          test cases, the Court issued its Memorandum Opinion sustaining              
          virtually all of respondent's determinations in each of the test            
          cases.  See Dixon v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1991-614.                     
          Thereafter, the Court entered decisions in the test cases in                
          accordance with the Court's opinion.                                        
               On June 10, 1992, the Court granted leave and filed                    
          respondent's motions to vacate the decisions in the test cases of           
          John Thompson (docket Nos. 19321-83, 31236-84, and 30965-85) and            
          John Cravens (docket Nos. 16900-83 and 15135-84).  Respondent               
          stated in her motions to vacate that she believed her lead                  
          counsel in the trial of the test cases had, prior to trial,                 
          entered into contingent settlement agreements with Thompson and             
          Cravens that were not made known to the Court or to the other               
          parties in the test cases, and that the decisions entered by the            
          Court in those dockets did not accurately reflect the prior                 
          agreements.  Respondent's motions to vacate requested a hearing             



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011