Hospital Corporation of America and Subsidiaries - Page 87

                                       - 70 -                                         

                    a descriptive phrase intended to present the basic                
                    test used for identifying structural components.                  
                    The preceding elements are examples of items which                
                    meet the test as a general rule.  Items which                     
                    occur in an unusual circumstance and do not relate                
                    to the operation or maintenance of a building                     
                    should not be structural components despite being                 
                    listed in section 1.48-1(e)(2), Income Tax Regs.                  
                    * * *                                                             
               We also quoted the Technical Explanations of the Revenue Act           
               of 1962 which explained the language which was incorporated            
               in the regulation as follows:                                          
                    The term "structural components" of a building                    
                    includes such parts of the building as central                    
                    air-conditioning and heating systems, plumbing,                   
                    and electric wiring and lighting fixtures,                        
                    relating to the operation [or] maintenance of the                 
                    building.  [H. Rept. 1447, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.                   
                    (1962), 1962-3 C.B. 503, 516; S. Rept. 1881, 87th                 
                    Cong., 2d Sess. (1962), 1962-3 C.B. 843, 859.]                    
               In accordance, we concluded that property fails to qualify             
               for the credit if it relates to the overall operation or               
               maintenance of a building rather than being used to aid in             
               the employment of a particular function or particular piece            
               of property.  See Central Citrus Co. v. Commissioner, 58               
               T.C. 365, 374 (1972).                                                  
                    We focused on the ultimate uses of power at the                   
               taxpayer's facility in Scott Paper Co. and distinguished the           
               power used in the overall operation or maintenance such as             
               lighting, heating, ventilation and air-conditioning of the             
               building and the power used to operate the taxpayer's                  
               machinery.  Scott Paper Co. v. Commissioner, supra at 183-             
               184.  We thus concluded in Scott Paper Co. that:                       
                    To the extent that the primary electric carried                   
                    electrical loads to be used for pulp and paper                    
                    production processes or other such qualifying                     
                    uses, the investment credit will be allowed for                   
                    the primary electric improvements.                                
                         To the extent that the primary electric                      
                    improvements relate to the overall operation [or]                 
                    maintenance of buildings, they are structural                     
                    components of such buildings, and they do not qualify             
                    as tangible personal property.                                    




Page:  Previous  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011