Hospital Corporation of America and Subsidiaries - Page 90

                                       - 73 -                                         

          respondent agrees is 5-year personal property.  We refer to the             
          branch wiring and special electrical equipment in issue in the              
          subject category collectively as the branch electrical systems.             
               Petitioners contend that the branch electrical systems are             
          section 1245 class property pursuant to the reasoning of Scott              
          Paper Co. v. Commissioner, 74 T.C. 137 (1980), and its progeny,             
          as well as Rev. Rul. 66-299, 1966-2 C.B. 14.47  Petitioners                 
          contend that the parties agree that virtually every item to which           
          the branch wiring relates was appropriately classified as section           
          1245 class property.                                                        
               Respondent, however, contends that the disputed property               
          items in the subject category are inherently permanent and are              
          identified as a structural component (electric wiring) in section           
          1.48-1(e)(2), Income Tax Regs.  On brief, respondent segregates             
          the disputed property items into individual segments of conduit,            
          electrical wiring, junction boxes, outlets, and receptacles.                

          47    A revenue ruling reflects respondent's position on an issue           
          and is not binding precedent upon the Court.  See Halliburton Co.           
          v. Commissioner, 100 T.C. 216, 232 (1993), affd. without                    
          published opinion 25 F.3d 1043 (5th Cir. 1994); Stark v                     
          Commissioner, 86 T.C. 243, 250-251 (1986); Neuhoff v.                       
          Commissioner, 75 T.C. 36, 46 (1980), affd. 669 F.2d 291 (5th Cir.           
          1982).  We disregard a revenue ruling, if it conflicts with the             
          statute it supposedly interprets, with the statute's legislative            
          history, or if it is otherwise unreasonable.  E.g., Threlkeld v.            
          Commissioner, 848 F.2d 81, 84 (6th Cir. 1988), affg. 87 T.C. 1294           
          (1986). However, we may adopt its reasoning if we agree that the            
          ruling correctly applies the law.  Estate of Lang v.                        
          Commissioner, 64 T.C. 404, 406-407 (1975), affd. in part and                
          revd. in part 613 F.2d 770, 776 (9th Cir. 1980); Keating v.                 
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1995-101.                                          




Page:  Previous  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011