- 14 -
Petitioner's testimony regarding his compensation
arrangements with Mr. Hall, and his failure to keep track of
amounts due from Mr. Hall, was not credible. Petitioner
testified that payments varied and that there was no set amount
or percentage that determined what Mr. Hall was to pay him.
Q. What was the purpose of Mr. Hall's payments to you, Mr.
Hill?
A. In many areas, we worked around the property, of which
I didn't take off work, et cetera, and propose [sic] to
help him in order to help him with his work. And that
was basically the extent of it.
Q. Okay. And how much were you paid for this?
A. It varied.
Q. How about your --
A. There was no set amount.
Q. -- was it about 25 percent of what Mr. Hall was paid by
Bay Point?
A. I can't say that it was that. I don't know, sir, and I
don't remember the exact amounts. It was not ever
requested in the exact amount.
Q. How did you ever know that you were getting the right
amount of payment from Mr. Hall?
A. I guess I trusted him.
Q. So, you had no set arrangement with Mr. Hall as to how
much you were to be paid.
A. No, sir. Not on that. I did not.
Q. And so how would it work with Mr. Hall? At the end of
the week, how would you get paid?
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 NextLast modified: May 25, 2011