- 16 -
Q. That was purchased by whom?
A. Through Mr. Hall.
Q. Was that somehow related to what you were supposed to
have received as income?
A. It would have been part of it. Yes. I would have had
owned part of it.
Q. So, is it true that the amount of cash might not
necessarily reflect the total amount of income you
received?
A. Say that again now?
Q. Is it true that the amount of cash you received may not
necessarily be the amount of income that was reportable
by Mr. Hall?
A. Correct.
Q. And you testified, I believe, that you didn't know how
much that was?
A. Right.
Q. And the correct numbers are going to depend upon how
much of these expenses Mr. Hall was going to charge to
you versus charging to himself?
A. Right.
It appears from petitioner's testimony that he is asserting
that it was impossible for him to estimate the amount of income
received from Mr. Hall because, in addition to the large amounts
of cash that petitioner received directly from Mr. Hall, some
unknown amount was also paid by Mr. Hall on petitioner's behalf
to some undisclosed third party. This vague testimony is
inconsistent with the statement petitioner made in his signed
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 NextLast modified: May 25, 2011