Estate of Paul Mitchell, Deceased, Patrick T. Fujieki, Executor - Page 32

                                       - 32 -                                         

                                       OPINION                                        
          Issue 1.  Moment-of-Death Value of JPMS Stock                               
               The primary issue for decision is the moment-of-death value of         
          1,226 shares of JPMS common stock held by the Trust.  Petitioner            
          now contends that the stock was worth between $23,062,000 and $29           
          million.  Respondent now asserts the value to be $81 million, or            
          $24 million less than that determined in the notice of deficiency.          
               Section 2031(a) requires a decedent's "gross estate" to be             
          determined for Federal estate tax purposes "by including * * * the          
          value at the time of his death of all property, real or personal,           
          tangible or intangible, wherever situated."  Value is determined at         
          the moment of death.12  Ahmanson Found. v. United States, 674 F.2d          

               12   The following statements made by the Court of Appeals             
          for the Fifth Circuit in United States v. Land, 303 F.2d 170, 172           
          (5th Cir. 1962), are, in our opinion, pertinent to our                      
          determination that the valuation of the 1,226 shares of JPMS                
          common stock held by the Trust must be pinpointed to the moment             
          of Mr. Mitchell's death:                                                    
                         Brief as is the instant of death, the                        
                    court must pinpoint its valuation at this                         
                    instant--the moment of truth, when the                            
                    ownership of the decedent ends and the                            
                    ownership of the successors begins.  It is a                      
                    fallacy, therefore, to argue value before--                       
                    or--after death on the notion that valuation                      
                    must be determined by the value either of the                     
                    interest that ceases or of the interest that                      
                    begins. Instead, the valuation is determined                      
                    by the interest that passes, and the value of                     
                    the interest before or after death is                             
                    pertinent only as it serves to indicate the                       
                    value at death.  In the usual case death                          
                    brings no change in the value of property.                        
                                                             (continued...)           




Page:  Previous  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011