Estate of Paul Mitchell, Deceased, Patrick T. Fujieki, Executor - Page 40

                                       - 40 -                                         

                    2.  The McGraw Report                                             
               Petitioner's second expert, Kenneth W. McGraw, is managing             
          director of Patricof & Co. Capital Corp., an investment banking             
          firm. He has approximately 36 years of experience in finance                
          markets and investment banking.                                             
               Utilizing a comparative companies analysis, Mr. McGraw valued          
          the 1,226 shares of JPMS common stock at approximately $29 million.         
          (In this analysis, he used virtually the same group of comparable           
          public companies as Mr. Weiksner.) Mr. McGraw adjusted JPMS'                
          financial data in deriving an earnings model to which he applied            
          his comparable companies analysis.  To represent the amount JPMS            
          would have to spend to replace the benefits of Mr. Mitchell's               
          services, Mr. McGraw estimated that additional expenditures for             
          advertising and administrative expenses would increase JPMS'                
          advertising and promotional expenses to 16 percent of total                 
          revenues.  He also removed Mr. Mitchell's compensation expense from         
          the financial data.19                                                       
               Mr. McGraw reduced his approximate $109 million theoretical            
          publicly traded value for JPMS by an extraordinary risk discount,           
          through a 15-percent reduction to his average EBIT and average              
          EBITDA.  Mr. McGraw then applied a 45-percent marketability                 

               19   Mr. McGraw did not believe that a reduction in Mr.                
          DeJoria's compensation was a circumstance upon which a                      
          prospective purchaser of the shares could reasonably depend.                
          Thus, he did not adjust Mr. DeJoria's historical compensation for           
          purposes of this analysis.                                                  




Page:  Previous  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011