Pope & Talbot, Inc., & Subsidiaries - Page 12

                                       - 12 -                                         
          timberland containing about 422,523 MBF of merchantable timber as           
          of December 20, 1985, and concluded that the market value of the            
          property was $63.5 million.  Mr. Prochnau first divided the                 
          timberland into six smaller parcels based on geographic location            
          and market access.  His rationale for doing so was:  (1) To                 
          attract buyers who are interested in specific income property or            
          may be incapable of financing the purchase of larger properties,            
          (2) to liquidate the property quickly, and (3) to maximize sales            
          revenue (smaller units reduce the discount related to the                   
          wholesale nature of larger sales).  Mr. Prochnau then applied a             
          valuation methodology similar to that of Mr. Granvall.  He                  
          estimated the value of each component (i.e., merchantable timber,           
          reproduction timber, and bare land) and multiplied the total by a           
          ratio to arrive at the total market value.                                  
               In estimating the value of merchantable timber, which he               
          defined as softwood stands 50 years and older and hardwood stands           
          40 years or older, Mr. Prochnau used published price quotes and             
          contract sales prices to arrive at an average9 delivered log                
          price of $199.82/MBF.  He then subtracted the following average             
          logging costs:                                                              



          9The average amounts of delivered log prices and logging                    
          costs are spread over only five of the six parcels of timberland,           
          because tract number six contained no merchantable timber.                  






Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011