Pope & Talbot, Inc., & Subsidiaries - Page 28

                                       - 28 -                                         
                    information center                 1,525,106                      
                    Marina and related improvements    1,314,653                      
                    Miscellaneous                      112,194                        
                    Total                            $4,641,036                       

               Finally, Mr. Slack estimated the value of approximately 959            
          acres of bare, undeveloped land at $2,129,003 using the market              
          approach.  In arriving at this value, Mr. Slack considered the              
          wastewater treatment problems at Port Ludlow to be a particularly           
          significant factor.  Even after the planned sewer expansion                 
          project, some of the land would be left without access to the               
          wastewater treatment system.  Moreover, most of the land had soil           
          characteristics that did not allow for on-site sewer systems.               
          Mr. Slack apportioned part of the $3 million expected costs for             
          the sewer upgrade to the bare and improved land.  Mr. Slack also            
          made adjustments to his comparable sales to account for                     
          differences in access and view.  No time adjustment was made,               
          however, because land values remained stable in Jefferson County            
          during the time period.                                                     
               In sum, Mr. Slack estimated the value of the Port Ludlow               
          community, including the developed lots, the undeveloped land,              
          and all the improvements, less total estimated sewer expansion              
          costs of $3 million, at $3,945,000.                                         
               Respondent’s experts, Christopher K. Monger and Michael F.             
          Griffin of Palmer, Groth & Pietka, Inc., determined that the                
          highest and best use of the property is its current use as a                





Page:  Previous  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011