United Cancer Council, Inc. - Page 87

                                       - 71 -                                         
               Among the concerns raised by petitioner’s certified public             
          accounting firm in its later management letter dated May 23,                
          1986, to petitioner’s board of directors and executive committee,           
          are the following:                                                          
               2. W&H Responsibility for Documentation.                               
               It is our understanding that certain procedures in the areas           
               of purchasing and cash disbursements are executed by W&H               
               personnel.  We performed a limited test of such procedures             
               and have the following observations:                                   
               a.   We could not locate a check request for each cash                 
                    disbursement.  It was our understanding that at the               
                    very minimum, each check issued is to have a                      
                    corresponding check request identified with it.  The              
                    check request is the only document which indicates W&H            
                    approval of the cash disbursement.                                
               b.   During our testing, there were several instances where            
                    we could not locate the invoice(s) associated with                
                    specific checks.  We recommend that Council personnel             
                    perform a timely limited review of all cash                       
                    disbursements to insure that the proper supporting                
                    documentation exists.  One area that needs special                
                    attention is postage.  Although invoices are not issued           
                    for postage disbursements, receipts are given to W&H              
                    upon payment.  We strongly recommend that the Council             
                    request that the original postage receipt be sent to              
                    the Council and if W&H requires the receipts for their            
                    files, they could retain a copy of the receipt.                   
                    Although our testing did not indicate that any of the             
                    checks written for postage were used for items other              
                    than postage, the receipts would provide verification             
                    of these substantial expenditures.  [See supra table 7,           
                    which shows that postage and shipping was petitioner’s            
                    largest category of expenses for 1985, 1986, 1987, and            
                    1988.]                                                            
               c.   W&H appears to be decidedly lacking in its adherence to           
                    the stated procedures regarding obtaining competitive             
                    bids on behalf of the Council.  A number of the goods             
                    and services are paid for on a contractual basis so               
                    that the main items subject to purchase using                     
                    competitive bids are printing and mailhouse costs.  Of            
                    the items we examined on a test basis which should have           
                    been subject to competitive bids, we could find                   
                    documentation that bids had been obtained only                    



Page:  Previous  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011