United Cancer Council, Inc. - Page 90

                                       - 74 -                                         
                    Concerning moving the Escrow Account Payable management           
               to the [petitioner’s] Carmel office early in 1987, you are             
               probably referring to the discussion we had concerning this            
               matter during the last visit by you and * * * [petitioner’s            
               executive director] to our offices in Alexandria.  At that             
               time, we mentioned that only one of W&H’s clients handles              
               this function in that way.  That organization maintains a              
               surplus cash balance in their accounts in excess of $2                 
               million and a positive fund balance of over $400,000.  It is           
               our policy that once a client is able to develop a positive            
               fund balance or the outstanding deficit can otherwise be               
               reduced to a reasonable level, we would be supportive of               
               such a move as we have been in the past.                               
                    Frankly, with nearly $500,000 in outstanding postage              
               loans to UCC on the books as of last week, it makes us                 
               somewhat nervous to hear mention of this again for the                 
               reasons outlined in your letter.  Certainly those areas that           
               were brought up can easily be overcome.  If, on the other              
               hand, there has been any serious discussion within your                
               organization which is outside the scope of what we have                
               already stated, I would appreciate your advising me so that            
               we can review this with * * * [Watson] and * * * [the W&H              
               executive who handled petitioner’s account on a daily                  
               basis].                                                                
               In her letter dated January 30, 1987, to Watson,                       
          petitioner’s chief financial officer discussed her understanding,           
          from her meeting and discussions with Watson and two W&H                    
          executives on January 28, 1987, of some actions W&H would take to           
          address petitioner’s concerns with respect to the conduct of its            
          direct mail campaign and the accounting for and disbursement of             
          funds to pay the mailing campaign expenses.  Among these actions            
          to be taken by W&H, the letter states that Watson “will write an            
          addendum to the  * * *  [Escrow Agreement] which would allow  the           
          Council to approve invoices paid by the Escrow Agent [WIB]. The             
          Council would be able to provide written requests for payment of            
          invoices without the approval of  * * *  [W&H].”  With respect to           




Page:  Previous  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011