John DiFronzo - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         

               Petitioner was found guilty of conspiracy and substantive              
          counts of mail and wire fraud.  On May 25, 1993, he was sentenced           
          to 37 months' imprisonment, a $10,000 fine, and a $200 special              
          assessment.  Petitioner subsequently filed an appeal with the               
          Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.  On May 24, 1994, the               
          Ninth Circuit affirmed petitioner's conviction but reversed the             
          sentence and remanded for resentencing.  On July 18, 1994,                  
          petitioner was resentenced to 16 months' imprisonment, a $10,000            
          fine, and a $200 special assessment.                                        
               On his 1993 Individual Income Tax Return, petitioner took a            
          deduction of $125,000 for "Legal fees incurred in the defense of            
          indictment no CR92-62-WBE in the United States District Court for           
          the Southern District of California in which taxpayer was                   
          convicted of mail fraud.  Deduction pursuant to IRC section 162             
          and Commissioner v. Tellier 383 U.S. 687 (1966)."  Petitioner's             
          filing status was married filing separate.  On May 28, 1996, the            
          Commissioner issued a notice of deficiency to petitioner                    
          disallowing the $125,000 deduction.2                                        
          1.  Substantiation                                                          
               Petitioner deducted $125,000 in legal fees on his 1993                 
          return.  His substantiation consists of three sets of documents.            

               2  A number of other issues were raised in the notice of               
          deficiency.  However, they appear to have resulted from the                 
          disallowance of the deduction for legal fees.  Both parties                 
          argued only the deductibility of the legal fees in their briefs             
          and trial memoranda.                                                        




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011