- 10 - 162(c),(f); Hawronsky v. Commissioner, 105 T.C. 94, 97-101 (1995), affd. without published opinion 98 F.3d 1338 (5th Cir. 1996); Tippin v. Commissioner, 104 T.C. 518, 528 (1995); Zecchini v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1992-8, but the payment here of legal expenses is no more illegal than the payment of rent or utility charges. To the extent that petitioner has established the payment of the legal fee in question, we hold that he is entitled to the claimed deduction. Decision will be entered under Rule 155.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Last modified: May 25, 2011