- 6 - Gilmore as 'expenses paid or incurred * * * in carrying on any trade or business' within the meaning of section 162(a)." Id. at 689. The criminal convictions in this case provide proof of petitioner's involvement in an illegal trade or business. The indictment alleges that 6. The Chicago organized crime family obtained income through the pursuit of a variety of illegal activities, including but not limited to bookmaking, loansharking, extortion, illegal gambling, trafficking in stolen property, and fraud, and would travel in interstate commerce in furtherance of those activities. It also alleges that petitioner was a "crew chief", or a mid- level leader in the Chicago organized crime family. The indictment chronicles petitioner's involvement in one particular money-making scheme. Specifically, petitioner and his confederates planned to invest money in a gambling operation without disclosing to the Rincon Indians that the money came from the Chicago organized crime family. They planned to structure the gambling operation in such a way that the crime family would maximize its profits at the Indians' expense. They also planned to skim profits and use the operation to launder funds from other illegal activities of the crime family. The criminal charges against petitioner originated from his business activities as a member of the Chicago organized crime family. His legal fees, incurred in defense of those charges, are deductible under section 162(a).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011