Earl M. Hasbrouck and Donna M. Hasbrouck - Page 12

                                       - 12 -                                         

                    No expenses have been incurred since the purchase                 
                    of the land which do not specifically relate to                   
                    the use of the property as prescribed by the CRP                  
                    contract.  Taxpayers have not incurred costs of a                 
                    nature which are only for the future use of their                 
                    farm after they are no longer being paid by the                   
                    CRP.                                                              
          In the protest letter petitioners requested that the matter be              
          transferred to the appropriate Appeals officer if the Examination           
          Division did not agree with petitioners’ position.  In addition             
          to a Form 2848, Power of Attorney and Declaration of                        
          Representative, and the examination report, the protest letter              
          listed as enclosures the following:                                         
               CRP Contract                                                           
               Letter from ASCS Office dated 3/16/87                                  
               Letter from ASCS Office dated 8/8/90                                   
               Letter from ASCS Office dated 9/7/90                                   
               Letter from ASCS Office dated 7/20/93                                  
               Discussion of CRP payments from the “1992 Farm Income                  
                    Tax Workbook”                                                     
               Page 17 of IRS Publication 225                                         
          The letters from the ASCS Office listed above refer to the farm             
          status determination letters petitioners received annually from             
          the Cascade County ASCS.                                                    
               Sometime in September 1995, respondent requested that                  
          petitioners sign a waiver of the limitations period.  In a letter           
          dated October 2, 1995, to Mark Murray, Operations Manager at                
          respondent's Great Falls office, petitioners declined to sign the           
          waiver, stating:                                                            
               there is no need for an extension of time.  This matter                
               was appealed to higher authority three months ago.  It                 
               should not even be in your office.  It especially                      




Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011