- 20 - resolution.” In another letter to John Rigler, dated April 24, 1996, petitioners further requested that they be given more information from respondent's “technical manual” regarding “the administration of the IRS operations department for case preparation”. On May 3, 1996, petitioners retained Thomas E. Towe to represent them in this case.6 In a letter dated May 22, 1996, John Rigler responded to petitioners’ April 12, April 13, and April 24 letters. Mr. Rigler stated: You clearly have been frustrated in your efforts to find out what “court rulings” were referred to in the examination report proposing an adjustment to rental income and expenses on your 1990 income tax return. To rectify this problem, an IRS attorney researched this matter and provided me with the following information to give you: Under the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP), the farmer receives a yearly rental payment from the government in return for implementing a ten year conservation program. The farmer is barred from harvesting any crops from the land or utilizing it for grazing purposes. Other than planting cover and eradicating noxious weeds, the land must be left alone. See In re Matter of Lundell Farms, 86 B.R. 582, 584 (Bankr.W.D.Wis. 1988); 7 C.F.R. section 704.1 et seq. In In re Way, 120 B.R. 81, 82 (Bankr.S.D.Tex. 1990), the Court explained CRP as follows: “Under farm programs like the [CRP], owners and operators 6 On Mar. 6, 1997, Mr. Towe filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of record for petitioners. Mr. Towe’s motion was granted on Mar. 20, 1997.Page: Previous 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011